My Photo
Note: Jeff does not accept guest blog posts on A Dash of Insight.

For inquiries regarding advertising and republication, contact main@newarc.com

Follow Jeff on Twitter!

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Certifications

  • Seeking Alpha
    Seeking Alpha Certified
  • AllTopSites
    Alltop, all the top stories
  • iStockAnalyst
Talk Markets
Forexpros Contributor
Disclaimer
Copyright 2005-2014
All Rights Reserved

« Stress Test Leaks | Main | ETF Update: The Energy Advance »

May 07, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451ddb269e201157076cc4d970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Should You Own Junk Bonds?:

Comments

Russ Wood

Thanks for a thoughtful response Jeff.
For what it's worth, I read your site for your analysis because it is outside the mainstream (unique) and thus valuable. I rarely follow the links. I may be kidding myself, but I justify this because I am usually familiar with the cited story via other readings (the same links seem to show up on many blog linkfests). Still, your caution on the difference between blogger analysis and news is valid.
Boo-yah.

oldprof

Hi Russ,

You have raised a very good question. I tried to explain this in one of the articles.

My blog rankings are not among the top group and never will be. I do not do what it would take to get there. So I have no stat obsession. I do get occasional reports and I know what they show. They show the number of readers who click through to a source. Even when I strongly recommend reading the article or seeing the supporting charts, most people do not. They spend a couple of minutes on an article that it took me an hour or more to write, and they do not check my sources.

Perhaps that is testimony to reader confidence in my representations, but I think not. If you look at overall blog ratings, the "reach" measured as those who click to other sources, is very low compared to the page views.

So I do have evidence, but it is not as strong as I would like.

Another test is to read the comments from these posts. Go go one of my examples and see for yourself. It is basically boo-yah nation.

Thanks for a great question -- one that I cannot answer with complete authority.

Jeff

Neil

Hi

I agree with your comment on the danger of mixing political opinion with investment analysis. Political affiliation is largely conditioned either by your upbringing or some emotional attachment to the political organization/their ideas. On the other hand investment analysis requires a constant striving for objectivity.

The two things make uneasy bedfellows!

oldprof

Greg -- I understand your point. I have written a bit about the lack of any acceptable value metric right now. PGF was trading in the twenties before the Lehman downfall and as low as 5.27 a couple of months ago.

I find it a more conservative way of getting exposure to financial stocks, partly because I do not expect massive defaults in the group. That was the point of this article.

Goldman Sachs is my only other financial long at the moment.

If you don't like the equity market right now, and do not like financials, then you are right. This is certainly not your play.

Thanks.

Jeff

Russ Wood

Prof,
I am interested in a claim you've made now in at least 3 of your posts. The claim can be summarized as follows: you follow links in a blog post but hardly anyone else does.

How can you possibly know this? I assume you can track some basic stats on your own blog. Do you consider those stats reliable for the habits of your own readers? Do you also assume those trends hold for most readers on most blogs?

Just to be clear, I am not being argumentative, I am genuinely curious about your claim and how you arrived at that conclusion. If you have explained this elsewhere and I missed it, I apologize.

Thanks as always,
Russ

oldprof

Steve - Rising T-bond rates might be negative if one held bonds of the same maturities. The other factor is the wide spread because of the perceived risk. These are double-digit yields, so there is room for treasuries to move higher.

Good question, and thanks.

Jeff

Greg Feirman

Refuting one argument against junk bonds doesn't make the case for them either, Professor. What's your case that these things are undervalued, especially after the run they've had?

I'm a seller......

Steve

Any concern about rising long term T-bond rates? Would rising T-bond rates affect the prices on junk bonds negatively?

janet

Why would anyone listen to a source called ZERO HEDGE anyway??

The comments to this entry are closed.