The end of the calendar year provides a time for reflection, assessment, and a look ahead. As I sort through my notes and ideas, I am acting early on the resolution to post more of them in (semi-) real time for our group. We will still collect the various threads and provide more comprehensive analyses and reports as we have done in the past.
In looking over my agenda, I see that I have several themes that will reference Barry RItholtz, and that probably deserves some explanation.
In our office, we like Barry. We enjoy reading his work on RealMoney, one of the Cramer sites. We enjoy seeing him on TV. We enjoy reading his blog, The Big Picture. We think that he is intelligent and articulate, stating his case in a most effective fashion. We also admire the willingness to blog, since the Cramer site philosophy ended the reader comments. (Digression: I like the Cramer site concept, so I hope that Cramer's staff reconsiders the feedback issue. They are out of step with the modern trends in encouraging comments).
It just happens that, at least for the moment, we completely disagree with most of Barry's conclusions. Now I could try to craft a "straw-man" argument for everything I am trying to explain, but why bother when Barry is there with a strong argument for a different viewpoint. What we say will not make any difference to him, and it will help me explain to my band of followers why we are looking for a big rally while the expert on their TV says "Dow 7000!"
Since Barry's views change -- he's no perma-bear -- and so do mine, as those who cashed in during the 2000-2001 period remember, I'm sure we'll line up on the same side one of these days. At the moment, however, it will take some doing.